The Sad Facts of Wilkinson v Hicken (2023 EWHC 1983 Ch)
The case of Wilkinson v Hicken tells a poignant story of fractured family relationships, unresolved grievances, and a controversial estate plan. At its heart lies the life and legacy of Norman Gill, a retired businessman whose personal history was as complex as his ultimate wishes for his estate.
Born in 1935, Mr. Gill led a life marked by both professional success and personal turmoil. Despite his achievements, his family life was deeply strained. In 1979, he was charged with and pleaded guilty to conspiring to murder his wife, Mary, an event that deeply fractured his relationships with his children. Over time, these relationships continued to deteriorate, leaving a trail of emotional scars.
In 2015, Mr. Gill executed a will that reflected some degree of reconciliation with his family, leaving pecuniary legacies of £175,000 to each of his three children and grandchildren. However, three years later, in 2018, he executed a new will that dramatically reduced these legacies to £5,000 for each child and left nothing to his grandchildren. The remainder of his sizeable £5.3 million estate was directed to a charitable trust benefiting the people of Leicester, excluding his immediate family.
The stark changes in the 2018 will, combined with Mr. Gill’s mental health history, age, and terminal illness, led to a bitter legal dispute. His daughter challenged the will’s validity, claiming that her father lacked testamentary capacity and did not understand the implications of his decisions. Mr. Justice Williams ultimately upheld the will’s validity, finding no evidence of undue influence or lack of understanding. However, the judgment laid bare the enduring pain within the Gill family and the divisive consequences of Mr. Gill’s estate planning choices.
This case serves as a sobering reminder of the deep personal and legal complexities that can arise without carefully considered estate planning and the lasting impact these decisions can have on those left behind.
The High Court decision in Wilkinson v Hicken illustrates the intricate challenges that can arise when estate planning intersects with complex family dynamics. While Mr. Gill’s 2018 will was ultimately deemed valid, the litigation, emotional strife, and reputational damage that ensued might have been mitigated or avoided entirely through the proactive involvement of a skilled tax and trust specialist.
Here, we explore the lessons learned from the case and outline how proper professional guidance could have led to a more harmonious resolution.
1. Enhanced Safeguarding of Testamentary Capacity
One key issue raised in the case was whether Mr. Gill had the testamentary capacity to execute his 2018 will. A good tax and trust specialist would have:
o Obtained Medical Evaluations: Given Mr. Gill’s age, mental health history, and terminal illness, obtaining an independent medical opinion at the time of drafting the will would have helped confirm his testamentary capacity. This documentation would serve as strong evidence to defend against challenges.
o Collaborated with Psychologists or Mental Health Experts: To ensure his capacity was unimpaired by his personality disorder, a specialist could have consulted mental health professionals to assess whether he fully understood the implications of his decisions.
2. Ensuring Clarity and Consistency in Intent
Disinheriting immediate family members and leaving a sizeable estate to a charitable trust often raises suspicions. A tax and trust specialist could have mitigated these concerns by:
o Recording Detailed Instructions: Comprehensive documentation of Mr. Gill’s reasoning for the significant changes in his 2018 will would have helped defend against allegations of undue influence or lack of understanding. Video or written statements could have clearly shown his intent and reasoning.
o Recommending an Independent Legal Adviser: Suggesting that Mr. Gill’s children and grandchildren obtain independent legal advice would demonstrate fairness, further reducing grounds for disputes.
3. Structuring the Estate to Minimise Conflict
Mr. Gill’s decision to exclude his children and grandchildren created fertile ground for familial discord. A skilled specialist could have used alternative structures to achieve his philanthropic goals without alienating his family, such as:
o Creating a Lifetime Trust: By establishing a lifetime trust for his children and grandchildren, Mr. Gill could have ensured some financial security for his descendants while still directing the bulk of his estate toward charitable purposes.
o Incorporating Conditional Bequests: Conditional gifts, such as requiring beneficiaries to maintain certain behaviours or relationships, could have addressed Mr. Gill’s concerns while providing for his family.
o Involving Beneficiaries in Charitable Initiatives: By involving his family in the administration or governance of the charitable trust, Mr. Gill could have fostered goodwill and reduced the perception of exclusion.
4. Legal Safeguards Against Disputes
The failure to implement certain safeguards left the will vulnerable to contestation. A tax and trust specialist could have:
o Used a No-Contest Clause: Including a legally enforceable clause penalising any beneficiary who contests the will could have discouraged legal challenges.
o Engaged Multiple Witnesses and Professionals: Involving neutral witnesses, such as solicitors or financial advisers, in the drafting and execution process would have added credibility to the will’s validity.
o Periodic Reviews: Encouraging Mr. Gill to review his will with professional assistance periodically could have reduced the abruptness of the changes made in 2018, making the transition less contentious.
5. Emphasising Family Reconciliation
Finally, a specialist might have facilitated conversations between Mr. Gill and his family using mediation or family therapy beyond the legal and financial measures. Addressing grievances and fostering understanding prevented the estrangement that underpinned the disinheritance.
Conclusion
The sad result of Wilkinson v Hicken highlights the importance of comprehensive planning and proactive measures in estate administration. A qualified tax and trust specialist could have avoided much of the conflict by ensuring testamentary capacity, clarifying intentions, and structuring the estate in a way that balanced Mr. Gill’s philanthropic aspirations with his family’s needs. Ultimately, thoughtful estate planning secures a testator’s legacy and preserves family harmony, reducing the risk of costly and emotionally draining litigation.
Secure Your Legacy with Expert Succession Planning
At Wills Tax & Trusts, we specialise in comprehensive succession planning for estates valued at £1.5 million or more. Our bespoke solutions ensure your wealth is preserved, your wishes are honoured, and your loved ones are protected.
What We Offer:
- Expert Will Drafting and Estate Planning
- Tax-Efficient Trust Structures
- Protection Against Disputes and Legal Challenges
- Charitable Gifting Strategies
Don’t leave your estate to chance. Let our specialists guide you in securing your legacy for generations to come.
Contact Us Today to arrange your free 30-minute initial telephone consultation!
Your peace of mind is our priority.
Don’t wait for a life-altering event to prompt you into action – check out how well your family is protected by viewing our free video TODAY!
Ray Best
Like his academic development, writing came late to Ray. He has written several published works, “Inheritance Tax Planning – My Way” and “Shareholder Protection & Partnership Protection” and has had four feature articles published in Tax Adviser magazine, but the publication he is most noted for is the joint collaboration with Tony Granger “Inheritance Tax Simplified”.
